David Coltart Sparks Controversy with DA Strategy Advice and Call to Revive SADC Tribunal
David Coltart, the Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC) Mayor of Bulawayo, has recently authored an article under the auspices of the Brenthurst Foundation, offering strategic advice to South Africa’s Democratic Alliance (DA). In his piece, Coltart draws parallels between Zimbabwe’s past Government of National Unity (GNU) and South Africa’s current political landscape, suggesting that the DA could leverage such a coalition to diminish the African National Congress’s (ANC) dominance.
Advocacy for the SADC Tribunal’s Revival
A significant portion of Coltart’s article is dedicated to advocating for the reinstatement of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Tribunal. This judicial body was dissolved in 2011 after it ruled against Zimbabwe’s land reform initiatives, deeming them inconsistent with the rule of law. Coltart posits that reviving the Tribunal would reinforce legal standards across the region.
Allegations of a Regime Change Agenda
Critics argue that the Brenthurst Foundation’s involvement in the region, particularly its financial backing of initiatives like Tendai Biti’s proposed Constitutional Defence Forum (CDF), is indicative of a broader regime change agenda. They contend that such actions aim to destabilize Zimbabwe’s political environment, undermining the progress achieved under the Second Republic.
Controversial Statements and Accusations
Coltart’s article has sparked controversy due to statements perceived as racially insensitive. He warns that an alliance between the ANC and parties like the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) could lead to adverse outcomes, including “human and capital flight” and the “Russification of the country.” Detractors interpret these remarks as echoing colonial-era sentiments that question the governance capabilities of black-led administrations.
Critique of Morgan Tsvangirai’s Leadership
In his critique, Coltart reflects on Zimbabwe’s GNU period, expressing disappointment in the leadership of the late opposition leader, Morgan Tsvangirai. He alleges that Tsvangirai and other ministers became indistinguishable from their ZANU-PF counterparts, succumbing to the enticements of power and neglecting their reformist mandates.
Response from Former Liberation Movements
In light of these developments, the Former Liberation Movement (FLM) body is reportedly monitoring the situation closely. There are indications that FLM leaders plan to convene to strategize on safeguarding the achievements of the liberation struggle against perceived neo-colonial threats. This anticipated meeting underscores the FLM’s commitment to preserving regional stability and countering initiatives they view as undermining their sovereignty.
Conclusion
David Coltart’s recent article has ignited a multifaceted debate, touching on issues of regional governance, the legacy of liberation movements, and the complexities of post-colonial African politics. As discussions continue, stakeholders across the political spectrum are poised to engage in dialogues that will shape the future trajectory of Southern Africa’s political landscape.
